Saturday, July 11, 2026

Swastika confusion

 




A very short introduction to the swastika problematique (which seems to be vast) in Buddhism and the related Bon religion. Apparently, Buddhists don´t care if the swastika is turning left or right. In Bon, by contrast, the "yungdrung" must always turn left. 

According to the videos, at least in Buddhist Himalayan art, swastikas are often purely decorative in character. Some may turn right, others left, for the sake of symmetry and balance. In Chinese Buddhism, a buddha is often shown with a swastika on his body for some kind of theological reasons, but the videos never explain why. There is also the idea that Siddharta Gautama was born with small swastikas on his toes!

Kind of interesting, actually. I´ve seen the Chinese stuff before, in the AI-generated videos of that Buddhist nun I sometimes link to... 

Enchanted

 








Some Buddhist "goddesses" from Tibet and Nepal. The enchanting Kurukulla simply *must* be a hybrid between the Hindu deities Lalita Tripura Sundari and Kali. What Simhamukha might be is anybody´s guess, but there is a rare Tantric form of the wrathful Hindu god Narasimha called Narasimhi. The Nepalese Vasudhara seems more normal, LOL. From the ultimate nerd channel "Himalayan Art Resources". 

Over the hills and far away

 






Himalayan Art Resources (Inc) strikes again. This time with strange forms of Saraswati. Also featuring the five protector goddesses known as Pancha Raksha, who were originally personifications of scriptures containing spells. Tibetan Buddhism seems to be even more insanely complex and diverse than Hinduism. Even Jeff (the lecturer in the videos) is confused! I mean, dude. 

Wrathful gurus with hats

 


Yes, really. The title of this video is priceless...

Will the real Shiva please stand up?

 


I can´t stop looking at this peculiar YouTube channel, Himalayan Art Resources. This short video deals with Shiva-like figures in Tibetan Buddhist art. Frankly, some of them are so similar to Shiva that I suspect scholars of religion would argue that they *are* Shiva. Or rather that the Mahayana Buddhists appropriated symbols and myths associated with the Hindu god and projected them onto Avalokiteshvara, one of their most popular bodhisattvas. Note the strange female form of Shiva, also called Shiva (but pronounced Shivaa)!

OK, so I learned something new today. Maybe.

Friday, July 10, 2026

Stray feathers

 


I learned something new today. Did you know that the Indian National Congress was founded by a Scotsman? Yes, Allan Octavian Hume. He was a Theosophist. Of course he was a Theosophist! See link below. 

Allan Octavian Hume

Current mood

 


Well, I hope! 

Our only hope?

 

Credit: Jdpfive

LOL. Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, recently triggered a by-election in his own constituency of Clacton by resigning as Member of Parliament, only to declare his intention to run for the seat again. In other words: the by-election is political theater, probably to deflect from various parliamentary inquires into Farage´s finances. Labour, the Tories, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens and Restore (!) have all declared that they will boycott the by-election. This has opened the field for various micro-parties and novelty candidates, with Count Binface as the apparent front-runner in the anti-Farage camp. 

Yes, Count Binface. *That* guy again. 

He unsuccesfully tried to challenge the next Labour leader Burnham in Makerfield recently, and it seems he has now taken his rubbish to Clacton instead. Ahem, don´t you actually have to *live* in the constituency the seat of which you are contesting? Still, Farage´s opponents are in on the joke. From Wikipedia: 

>>>Many mainstream politicians reacted to Binface's candidature with a mixture of amusement and approbation. 

>>>Kemi Badenoch, the Leader of the Opposition said that if the by-election was a "people versus the establishment" contest, Binface might be the people's candidate. Keir Starmerthe prime minister, said he could not endorse him due to Labour Party rules. Andy Burnham, the favourite in the race to become the next Labour leader, posted a picture of himself shaking hands with Binface at a by-election. 

>>>The New Statesman´s business editor, Will Dunn, endorsed Binface and called for a united front in support of his candidacy. Martin Bell, who served as the independent MP for Tatton between 1997 and 2001, called for voters in Clacton to rally behind "the right independent candidate". Stephen Pollard, writing for The Spectator, called the election a straight "two-way fight" between Farage and Binface, and speculated that the latter could win.

>>>Binface received a surge of support from activists after announcing his candidacy, raising more than £15,000 in donations in a day. He said he hoped to appeal to voters from all sides of the political spectrum and said he could even court the immigrant vote, given he was "the ultimate alien".Green energy industrialist Dale Vince, who has previously donated to the Labour and Green Parties, offered to fund Binface's campaign. His campaign gained global media attention.

The latter seems to be true, since I read (with some surprise) about Binface´s splendid intervention in a Swedish newspaper just now. Or rather at their on-line site. And no, I don´t think Harvey (the Count´s real name) can win over Farage, who carried Clacton with 46,2% of the votes in 2024. That being said, I admit this was a rather jolly little distraction! 

Thursday, July 9, 2026

Tyger tyger burning bright

 


"Apparently, some so-called scientists (big game hunters, more like it) of the Afrikan Ape persuasion claim that tigers and panthers are products of a blind process of evolution which didn´t have us in mind?! May the holy were-cat curse and consume these blasphemers!" 

"Oh, and they claim that tigers are orange and panthers black, when everyone knows that we´re actually green and blue. I mean, what the heck is `orange´anyway? As any feline philosopher can tell you, color is an objective property of reality."

"Read my lips before I eat you: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ORANGE ON THE PLANET OF THE CATS!!!"

"What?" 

Concealment


 

According to atheism as informed by modern science, God doesn´t exist. Humans are temporary products of a blind process of evolution that didn´t have them in mind. Here is an intriguing idea: God does exist *and* humans are products of a blind process of evolution that didn´t have them in mind.

How does that make you feel, earthling?